What is Your Goal-Setting Philosophy?

There are basically two types of goal-setting philosophies I run into when working with leadership teams:

  1. The first type is where they shoot for the stars, and if they hit the moon, at least they’ve made progress.
  2. The second type is where they shoot for the moon and plan on hitting the moon (aka set ’em to hit ’em).

Frankly, both types work. The problem is that most of the time both types exist on the same leadership team, and this causes a lot of complexity. What is vital is that you and your leadership team choose one. When you have two types of goal-setting philosophies on one team, it creates not only complexity but also tremendous confusion and lack of accountability.

Both do work, and it is merely a matter of agreeing on which one your team will use. The philosophy I urge is the second type, that of shooting for the moon with the intention of hitting the moon (a little bit of a stretch is okay). The reason is that when you review your goals at the end of the year (or Rocks at the end of the quarter) you can then evaluate, learn from, and solve anything that you didn’t hit by analyzing the gaps to discover if you were simply overshooting, whether it was an accountability issue, or if it was some other obstacle.

If you are a shoot-for-the-stars type of goal setter, one of the downsides is that when it comes time to report on the goal being complete, you will tend to lack clarity of what true success is, leading to rationalizing your way out of accountability and conveniently forgetting what its intent was.

Regardless of which one you choose, please choose. It will lead to a healthier leadership team.

Related Posts

Finding Your Team’s GWC™ Flow Channel

Having the right people in the right seats is essential to your organization’s success. GWC (Get it, Want it, Capacity to do it) serves as the criteria for determining if a person is operating within their true skill set. But how does GWC work over time? That’s where finding your team’s GWC Flow Channel comes in.

Read on »

The Key to Business as Usual (BAU)

Scorecards are often a highly undervalued tool. Plus, it can be hard to develop a good one. In reality, it can take months to get it right. Even when you’ve nailed it, you will still want to review it every 90 days to make sure it gives you data that you can use to make better business decisions.

Read on »

Subscribe to the EOS Blog

Subscribe to the EOS Blog:

LOGIN TO

Base Camp

LOGIN TO

Client Portal

LOGIN TO

ORGANIZATIONAL CHECKUP

Search the EOS Worldwide Blog

Skip to content